In
recent decades, state funding for preschool programs has more than
tripled as more states are trying to create universal access to pre-k.
Efforts to expand pre-k access typically include the use and
coordination of multiple preschool settings, notably those found in
public schools and private community-based organizations, which often
have distinct goals, resources, requirements, funding sources, and
reporting systems.
In this challenging context, the present study
examined the empirical example of an ambitious policy initiative to
provide high-quality universal pre-k (UPK) in New York City. Inheriting a
mixed-delivery system for UPK provision, the city employed substantial
resources to increase and align quality across programs in different
settings and with varied auspices.
Comparing program and classroom data,
the analysis identified significant variation by program setting and
auspice that appears to have roots in systemic obstacles that are far
from unique to New York City. The findings could inform policymakers
nationwide who are striving to build effective systems for the provision
of equitable, high-quality early childhood education.
No comments:
Post a Comment