Mentoring
programs, which pair youth with caring, non-parental adults with the
goal of promoting positive youth development, are an increasingly
popular strategy for early intervention with at-risk youth. However,
important questions remain about the extent to which these interventions
improve youth outcomes.
The present study involved a comprehensive
meta-analysis of all outcome studies of intergenerational, one-on-one
youth mentoring programs written in the English language between 1975
and 2017, using rigorous inclusion criteria designed to align with
developmental theories of youth mentoring.
Analysis of 70 mentoring
outcome studies, with a sample size of 25,286 youth (average age of 12
years old), yielded a statistically significant effect of mentoring
programs across all youth outcomes. The observed effect size fell within
the medium/moderate range according to empirical guidelines derived
from universal prevention programs for youth, and was consistent with
past meta-analyses of youth mentoring.
Moderation analyses indicated
that programs serving a larger proportion of male youth, deploying a
greater percentage of male mentors or mentors with a helping profession
background, and requiring shorter meetings yielded larger effect sizes,
as did evaluations that relied on questionnaires and youth self-report.
Taken together, these findings provide some support for the efficacy of
mentoring interventions, while also emphasizing the need to remain
realistic about the modest impact of these programs as currently
implemented, and highlighting opportunities for improving the quality
and rigor of mentoring practices.
No comments:
Post a Comment