The negative impact of vouchers on student achievement is
equivalent to missing out on more than one-third of a year of classroom
learning.
How
bad are school vouchers for students? Far worse than most people
imagine. Indeed, according to the analysis conducted by the authors of this report, the use of school vouchers—which provide families with
public dollars to spend on private schools—is equivalent to missing out
on more than one-third of a year of classroom learning. In other words,
this analysis found that the overall effect of the D.C. voucher program
on students is the same as missing 68 days of school.
This
analysis builds on a large body of voucher program evaluations in
Louisiana, Indiana, Ohio, and Washington, D.C., all of which show that
students attending participating private schools perform significantly
worse than their peers in public schools—especially in math.1
A recent, rigorous evaluation of the D.C. Opportunity Scholarship
Program from the U.S. Department of Education reaffirms these findings,
reporting that D.C. students attending voucher schools performed
significantly worse than they would have in their original public
school.2
The
analysis is timely given President Donald Trump and Education Secretary
Betsy DeVos’ main education priority: to privatize education by
creating and expanding voucher programs nationwide. In the Trump budget
released in February, the president has suggested doubling investment in
vouchers.*3 But while President Trump and Secretary DeVos often assert that research backs their proposals, the evidence is lacking.
In
order to add necessary context to the recent voucher research—and the
debate over the budget—the authors compare the negative outcomes of one
of these voucher programs—the D.C. Opportunity Scholarship Program—to
other factors that negatively affect student achievement. That analysis
also finds that the effect of vouchers on student achievement is larger
than the following in-school factors: exposure to violent crime at
school, feeling unsafe in school, high teacher turnover, and teacher
absenteeism.4
To
be clear, the far-reaching negative effects of factors such as feeling
unsafe in school cannot be overstated. For example, there is a large
body of work that discusses the negative impact of exposure to violent
crime on children’s well-being, including academic performance.5
Certainly, many of these factors are serious and are known to have a
negative impact on multiple areas of child development.
However, the
comparisons made in this report focus only on how each in-school
factor—violence at school, feeling unsafe, teacher turnover, and teacher
absenteeism—affects school achievement.
Further,
using the Center for Research on Education Outcomes (CREDO) formula,
the authors of this report also found that the overall effect of the
D.C. voucher program on students is the equivalent of 68 fewer days of
schooling than they otherwise would have received had they remained in
their traditional public school. In other words, the students who
participated in the D.C. voucher program lost more than one-third of a
year of learning.6
To be clear, translating this effect into days of learning is an
approximation intended to help assess relative impact. In this case, 68
days lost is clearly substantial lost ground for students participating
in the D.C. voucher program.
No comments:
Post a Comment