This month, on April 3, the U.S. Department of Education completed the
first part of its monthslong effort to deregulate higher education in
the name of “innovation.” The Education Department and a group of
stakeholders reached an agreement on the new set of rules, which would
rewrite how the department oversees college accreditation agencies and
how these organizations are supposed to ensure college quality. The
agreed-upon language still needs to be published for public comment,
but—if finalized—the Trump administration will have accomplished the
largest unraveling in history of rules that guide accreditation,
weakening the ability of accreditors to serve as watchdogs over colleges
and removing mechanisms to hold accreditors responsible for their
oversight.
This issue brief looks at seven of the most troubling changes that emerged in the proposal »
These
new rules have the potential to get worse before they are finalized.
The Education Department will need to release a notice of proposed
rule-making based on the consensus it achieved and solicit public
comment. That creates another opportunity for industry to lobby the
department and the White House to make the language even weaker; groups
could lobby, for example, for colleges to be allowed to make even more
changes without the approval of an accreditor. But even if the language
does not change further, what was agreed to last month raises the
likelihood of new risks that students and taxpayers simply cannot
afford.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.