Chronic
absenteeism and truancy have been linked to a variety of undesirable
outcomes for students including increased risk of dropout, lower test
scores, lower educational and social engagement, juvenile delinquency,
and substance abuse. One controversial response to truancy is the use of
exclusionary discipline, such as out-of-school suspensions (OSS). Out
of concern that such a practice is counter-intuitive and likely not
effective at improving student engagement or academic outcomes, some
states have recently banned this practice altogether.
This analysis uses Arkansas as a case study to estimate the impact of a state-level ban on the use of OSS for truancy on attendance—an important measure related to student engagement and opportunity to learn.
Using an eight-year panel of student-level data in a difference-in-differences framework, the auyhors find no evidence of improvement in attendance for truant students. Implications for policy design, implementation, and evaluation are discussed.
This analysis uses Arkansas as a case study to estimate the impact of a state-level ban on the use of OSS for truancy on attendance—an important measure related to student engagement and opportunity to learn.
Using an eight-year panel of student-level data in a difference-in-differences framework, the auyhors find no evidence of improvement in attendance for truant students. Implications for policy design, implementation, and evaluation are discussed.
No comments:
Post a Comment