This project investigated laws, access, equity, and missingness
related to gifted education identification as reported biennially to the
federal government Office of Civil Rights by all public
schools in 2000, 2011–2012,
2013–14, and 2015–16. Specifically, this study examines these areas nationally, and by state across schools for Non-Title
I and Title I schools, by Locale (i.e., City, Suburb, Town, Rural), and by Race
(i.e., American Indian/Alaska Native American Alaska Native [AIAN]; Asian;
Black; Latinx; Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander [NHPI]; Two or More Races [TMR];
and White). Report cards were developed for each state and findings were
synthesized. Representation
indices were used to
investigate equity. These analyses were compared to previous
similar analyses.
Most states have laws concerning gifted education (N=38);
however, laws vary widely with some only having language requiring
identification (N=7) but not services, and some requiring identification and
services (N=30). Of those 30 states, 6 have no funding and 4 are fully funded. Of
the remaining 13 states with no laws, 11 have language, with 4 of those having
partial funding. Only 2 states have no language, mandate, or funding. The top
25 states in terms of access to identification have mandates. Although access
does not necessarily translate to equity, it is essential for equity.
Additionally, access results in lower numbers of missing students. Those states
with fully funded mandates for identification and services (FL, GA, IA, OK)
lead in access to gifted education services, with Florida and Oklahoma showing
promise in areas of equity.
This report as well as each state report card with narrative
of methods and findings can be downloaded at www.purdue.edu/geri
and click access denied.At this interactive website (URL)
visitors can find visual summaries of the data contained in the full report.
No comments:
Post a Comment