-->
This paper investigates the impact of extending free school lunch to all students,
regardless of income, on academic performance in New York City middle schools.
Using a difference-in-differences design and unique longitudinal, student level
data, the authors derive credibly causal estimates of the impacts of “Universal Free
Meals” (UFM) on test scores in English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics, and
participation in school lunch.
The authors find UFM increases academic performance by as
much as0.083 standard deviations in math and 0.059 in ELA for non-poor
students, with smaller, statistically significant effects of 0.032 and 0.027
standard deviations in math and ELA for poor students. Further, UFM increases
participation in school lunch by roughly 11.0 percentage points for non-poor
students and 5.4 percentage points for poor students.
The authors also investigate the
academic effects of school lunch participation per se, using UFM as an
instrumental variable. Results indicate that increases in school lunch participation
improve academic performance for both poor and non-poor students; an additional
lunch every two weeks increases test scores by roughly 0.08 standard deviations
in math and 0.07 standard deviations in ELA. Finally, we explore potential
unintended consequences for student weight outcomes, finding no evidence that
UFM increases the probability students are obese or overweight.
The authors find no
evidence of increases in average BMI. Instead, we find some evidence that
participation in school lunch improves weight outcomes for non-poor students.
Results are robust to an array of alternative specifications and assumptions
about sample.
No comments:
Post a Comment