A recent Manhattan Institute report argues that the idea of what constitutes a “public” school should be expanded to include private schools that receive public funding. The report also contends that public funding for education should in fact be divided between traditional district public schools, charter schools, and private schools, with funding decisions based on student enrollment. Expansion of funding, it concludes, will result in greater choice for all students and will improve the quality of education.
Joel Westheimer of the University of Ottawa reviewed The Case for Educational Pluralism in the U.S.,
and found several serious problems. The report, he explained, is
plagued by a lack of evidence, flawed logic, and a failure to consider
differences in economic, social, political, and regulatory contexts. He
also noted that the report’s central argument originates primarily from
“conceptual perspectives” rather than empirical research.
The empirical studies the
report does use are drawn primarily from religious and school choice
advocacy groups. Also, the well-designed and peer-reviewed studies it
uses lead to conclusions only loosely tied or entirely unrelated to
public funding of private schools.
Professor Westheimer concludes
that, while the report may prove useful for those who seek a rhetorical
appeal for public funding of a private school education, it offers
little useful to policymakers whose goal is to improve access to quality
schools.
Find the review, by Joel Westheimer, at:
Find The Case for Educational Pluralism in the U.S., written by Ashley Rogers Berner and published by the Manhattan Institute, at:
No comments:
Post a Comment