Mathematical
achievement is important for children’s future educational success, employment
opportunities and health outcomes. However, it is recognised that there is
substantial underachievement in this subject. There is a
growing body of literature that assesses the impact of interventions on
mathematical achievement .
This review of published studies rigorously investigated the outcomes of
classroom-based mathematical interventions that were targeted at primary
school-aged children. The review assessed whether the interventions had an
effect on mathematical achievement (as measured by variety of outcome measures)
or related attitudinal or affective constructs (such as mathematical anxiety). The
review had a clearly defined method to identify studies. The criteria for
inclusion and exclusion for the study were also defined before the review
began. This plan was recorded on the internet prior to beginning the review
process so that readers can be assured that the work is rigorous
This
review included studies that assessed the outcomes of interventions aimed at
improving mathematical achievement in primary school-aged children. Forty-five
randomized control trials were included along with thirty-five quasi-experimental
studies. The studies were published between 2000 and 2017. These studies were
mostly conducted in the USA and Europe. Although the randomized control trial studies
used random assignment to groups, many did not follow rigorous methods to
reduce potential bias.
A
wide variety of studies were identified that focused on different topic areas
in mathematics, specifically conceptual understanding, understanding
magnitudes, knowledge of the number system, fluency with mathematics facts and strategy
use. The studies also used a number of different types of teaching methods,
such as the use of manipulatives, providing different types of feedback, using
computerized environments for learning and varying how information is delivered
to pupils (e.g. through song or story books).
Directly
comparing the effect size of interventions with such varied types, lengths and
target areas of mathematics would not lead to valid conclusions. Instead we
have summarised the approaches and findings of these studies highlighting the
interventions for which rigorous evidence of effectiveness does or does not exist.
What
are the key characteristics of the most effective interventions for improving mathematical
learning in primary-school aged children who do not meet the criteria for
mathematics disability (e.g. equipment involved, any associated costs)?
Seventy-two
out of the eighty included studies reported a positive impact of the
intervention on at least one academic outcome measure. In addition, twelve
studies also reported benefits for secondary outcomes, such as attitudes or
anxiety related to mathematics. Two studies reported actual costs of
interventions. Fourteen studies reported that teachers or assistants would
require specialist training to deliver the intervention. Many of the
interventions did not require specialist equipment for delivery; most
interventions involved routine materials that would be available in most
Western-context classrooms. Thirty-six studies required specialist software to
deliver the intervention, ten of these studies assessed commercially available
software.
Conclusions
The
studies identified in this review suggested that there are a number of
approaches that have potential to promote mathematical learning in mainstream
primary classrooms;1.Focusing on key topic areas in mathematics such asconceptual
understanding, magnitudes and basic number skills.2.Ensuring that children have
a fluent grasp of mathematical facts.3.Ensuring that children have a wide bank
of strategies to complete mathematical problems and that they know when to best
apply them.4.The appropriate use of objects as learning aids.5.Providing
effective and timely feedback.6.Using technology that has been developed with clear
understanding of how children learn.7.Varying how mathematical content is
delivered in the classroom, such as through physical activity or group work.
No comments:
Post a Comment