Highlights
- •
- Girls perform better than boys on performance-based ICT literacy assessments.
- •
- Gender differences are larger in primary schools than in secondary schools.
- •
- The overall effect size is robust across several analysis conditions.
- •
- No evidence of publication bias could be found.
- •
- Overall, the gender differences in ICT literacy are significant but small.
Abstract
The study of gender differences in academic achievement has been one of the core topics in education, especially because it may uncover possible gaps and inequalities
in certain domains. Whereas these differences have largely been
examined in traditional domains, such as mathematics, reading, and
science, the existing body of empirical studies in the domain of ICT literacy
is considerably smaller, yet abounds in diverse findings. One of the
persistent findings however is that boys consider their ICT literacy to
be higher than that of girls.
This meta-analysis tests whether the same
pattern holds for students’ actual performance on ICT literacy tasks, as
measured by performance-based assessments.
In total, 46 effect sizes were extracted from 23 empirical studies
using a random-effects model. Overall, the gender differences in ICT
literacy were significant, positive, and favored girls (g = + 0.12,
95 % CI = [0.08, 0.16]). This effect varied between studies, and
moderation analyses indicated that the grade level students were taught
at moderated its magnitude—effect sizes were larger in primary school as
compared to secondary school. In conclusion, our findings contrast
those obtained from previous meta-analyses that were based on
self-reported ICT literacy and suggest that the ICT gender gap may not
be as severe as it had been claimed to be.
No comments:
Post a Comment