This paper presents evidence of a positive relationship between school starting
age and children’s cognitive development from age 6 to 15 using a
regression discontinuity design and large-scale population-level birth
and school data from the state of Florida.
The authors estimate effects of being
relatively old for grade (being born in September versus August) that
are remarkably stable – always just around 0.2 SD difference in test
scores – across a wide range of heterogeneous groups, based on maternal
education, poverty at birth, race/ethnicity, birth weight, gestational
age, and school quality.
While the September-August difference in
kindergarten readiness is dramatically different by subgroup, by the
time students take their first exams, the heterogeneity in estimated
effects effectively disappears.
The paper documents substantial variation in
compensatory behaviors targeted towards young for grade children. While
the more affluent families tend to redshirt their children, young for
grade children from less affluent families are more likely to be
retained in grades prior to testing. School district practices regarding
retention and redshirting are correlated with improved outcomes for the
groups less likely to use those remediation approaches (i.e., retention
in the case of more-affluent families and redshirting in the case of
less-affluent families.)
The authors also study college and juvenile detention
outcomes using administrative data from a large Florida school district,
and show that being an older age at school entry increases children’s
college attainment and reduces the likelihood of being incarcerated for
juvenile crime.
No comments:
Post a Comment