This paper reports initial findings from a randomized evaluation
of a large privately-funded scholarship program for applicants to Nebraska's public
colleges and universities.
Randomly assigned aid offers increased aid received markedly. This in turn appears to have boosted
enrollment and persistence, while also shifting many applicants from two- to
four-year schools.
Awards offered to nonwhite applicants, to those with
relatively low academic achievement, and to applicants who targeted
less-selective four-year programs (as measured by admissions rates) generated
the largest gains in enrollment and persistence, while effects were much
smaller for applicants predicted to have stronger post-secondary outcomes in the
absence of treatment. Thus, awards enabled groups with historically-low
college attendance to ʽlevel up,' largely equalizing enrollment and persistence
rates with traditionally college-bound peers, particularly at four-year
programs.
Awards offered to prospective community college students had
little effect on college enrollment or the type of college attended.
No comments:
Post a Comment