Training principals for new roles is key to U.S. Department
of Education school reforms, according to a new report by SMU researchers. But
insufficient training and support for principals to meet the new expectations
is leading to a leadership crisis. Twenty percent of newly minted principals
leave the profession after two years and seasoned professionals are opting for
early retirement.
Education researchers Lee Alvoid and Watt Lesley Black Jr.
examine school districts at the forefront of supporting and training effective
principals in their report "The Changing Role of the Principal: How
High-Achieving Districts are Recalibrating School Leadership," published
July 1 by the Center for American Progress. As former principals and current
faculty members at SMU's Annette Caldwell Simmons School of Education and Human
Development, both Alvoid and Black bring unique insight to the study.
Teacher evaluation is key to President Obama's Race to the Top
education reform initiative, which in turn places demands on principals'
expertise and time.
After analyzing six school districts across the United
States with innovative support and training for principals, Alvoid and Black
developed key recommendations for school districts.
Their recommendations include focusing principal training on
coaching teachers, redesigning principal job descriptions to focus on teachers
and student outcomes, and developing partnerships with universities to recruit
and train future principals.
"Few reformers have paid attention to growing demands
on principals and few districts have intervened to help reevaluate the
tasks," says Alvoid, chair and clinical associate professor of education
policy and leadership at the Simmons School. "The districts we feature in
the report pay attention to the need of supporting practicing principals with
deeper instructional training as they implement stronger teacher evaluation
systems."
Strategies differ among school districts. The charter school
district Uplift Education in Dallas added at each school an operations
director, responsible for all non-instructional aspects of running a school,
such as building maintenance and student nutrition.
Charlotte-Mecklenburg schools in Charlotte, North Carolina
added a dean of students position to support principals with student issues.
Other districts strengthened principal training, particularly on coaching
teachers.
"The principal shapes the instructional vision and
goals and is positioned to leverage his or her influence to effect substantial
changes in instructional practice," says Black, clinical associate
professor of education and policy at the Simmons School. "In short —
though the teacher has the most direct impact on students — the principal has
the most direct impact on the teacher.''
No comments:
Post a Comment