An increasing number of students are participating in dual enrollment courses with a career and technical education focus, a trend that research shows should serve states interested in improving college completion and workforce investment.
The Education Commission of the
States has released a report highlighting research that links CTE dual
enrollment courses with improved outcomes for traditionally underserved
students. In some cases, students in CTE dual enrollment courses outperformed
those in traditional academic dual enrollment courses.
The report also outlined four
policy components that state leaders should consider to ensure access to CTE
dual enrollment programs and to assure the quality and transferability of the
courses.
Among the highlights of the research findings:
·
More than 80 percent of high schools have students in
dual enrollment programs, according to the most recent federal data, and nearly
half the schools have students in CTE dual enrollment classes.
·
That translates into more than 600,000 students in CTE
dual enrollment, or an annual growth rate of more than 5 percent between
2002-03 and 2010-11.
·
Studies show CTE dual enrollment students are more
likely to graduate high school, enroll in a four-year college or university
full-time and persist in higher education. Researchers in one study noted, “In many cases, male and
low-income students benefitted more from dual enrollment participation than
their more advantaged peers.”
Key policy
components for states to consider:
· Responsibility
for course fees should not fall to parents. For example, Florida
makes clear any dual enrollment student is exempt from paying course fees.
· Course
content and instructor credentials must mirror those of traditional postsecondary
instructors. Texas requires CTE dual
enrollment courses to be college-level technical education courses listed in
the state’s Workforce Education Course Manual.
· Courses
should incorporate industry curriculum and standards, and lead to certification.
State
should ensure course transferability.
No comments:
Post a Comment